Communication Strategy Education with a Cultural Perspective through a Co-Culture Communication Approach

Authors

  • Faris . Universitas Yudharta Pasuruan, Pasuruan, Indonesia
  • Nurma Yuwita Universitas Yudharta Pasuruan, Pasuruan, Indonesia
  • Ninuk Riswandari Universitas Yudharta Pasuruan, Pasuruan, Indonesia
  • Teguh Sarwo Aji Universitas Yudharta Pasuruan, Pasuruan, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61453/joit.v2025no29

Keywords:

Communication strategy, Co-culture communication, Cultural perspective, Intercultural competence, Systematic literature review

Abstract

This study presents a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) on communication strategy education with a cultural perspective through the co-culture communication approach. The review aims to synthesize theoretical foundations, pedagogical models, and empirical findings to better understand how cultural perspectives inform communication strategy education. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) framework guided the search and selection process. Articles published between 2010 and 2025 were retrieved from Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar using keywords related to communication strategy, co-culture communication, and intercultural competence. Through screening of 274 articles and the use of inclusion and exclusion criteria, the analysis included 42 peer-reviewed studies. Thematic synthesis identified four key findings: (1) the addition of a cultural perspective improves education for communication strategy through the development of critical cultural awareness; (2) co-culture pedagogies for communication focus on inclusivity and the voice of the marginal; (3) intercultural competence is a significant product of education; and (4) digital innovations facilitate the wider applicability of co-culture perspectives within higher education. This systematic review acknowledges the deficiencies within empirical evidence, especially within the non-Western world, and calls for longitudinal studies and investigations into digital pedagogies. The results contribute insightful information for teachers, policymakers, and researchers who aim to engage culture perspectives within the education of communication strategy for the achievement of equity, inclusivity, and intercultural competence.

References

Aksoy, A., & Heuman, A. (2024). “Being the Needle in the Haystack:” The Addition of “Blending” and “Co-Cultural Networking” As Practices to Orbe’s (1998) Co-Cultural Theory. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 53(1–2), 63–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/17475759.2024.2399096

Arasaratnam-Smith, L. (2017). Intercultural competence in international higher education (1st ed., pp. 294–302). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315529257-42

Arday, J., Zoe Belluigi, D., & Thomas, D. (2021). Attempting to break the chain: reimaging inclusive pedagogy and decolonising the curriculum within the academy. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 53(3), 298–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1773257

Aririguzoh, S. (2022). Communication competencies, culture and SDGs: effective processes to cross-cultural communication. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01109-4

Baecker, D. (2025). Distinguishing next society. Current Sociology, 73(4 Special Issue: Guiding distinctions of social theory), 493–508. https://doi.org/10.1177/00113921251332209

Baker, W. (2015). Research into Practice: Cultural and intercultural awareness. Language Teaching, 48(1), 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444814000287

Conti, L. (2025). Intercultural education: recalibrating meanings, objectives, and practices. Intercultural Education, 36(4), 418–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2025.2484514

Helm, F. (2015). The practices and challenges of telecollaboration in higher education in Europe. Language, Learning and Technology, 19(2), 197–217. https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/44424

Jackline, A. (2025). Communication Skills for Negotiating Settlements. Research Output Journal of Arts and Management, 4(1), 36–40. https://doi.org/10.59298/rojam/2025/413640

Jackson, J. (2018). Interculturality in international education. In Interculturality in International Education. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429490026

Kurylo, A. (2010). Teaching the difference between compromise and collaboration through trial and error. Communication Teacher, 24(1), 25–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/17404620903433440

Mahardika, D. D. K. (2024). Intercultural Communication in Multicultural Education: Strategies, Challenges, and Opportunities. International Journal of Philology, 15(February), 4–6. https://doi.org/10.31548/philolog15(1).2024.012

Mospan, N. (2023). Trends in emergency higher education digital transformation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 20(1), 50–70. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1382352.pdf

Nisiotis, L., Beer, M., & Uruchurtu, E. (2016). The use of cyber campuses to support online learning for students experiencing barriers accessing education. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Future Intelligent Educational Environments, 2(6), 151522. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.27-6-2016.151522

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Bmj, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Razzante, R. J., Boylorn, R. M., & Orbe, M. P. (2021). Embracing Intersectionality in Co-Cultural and Dominant Group Theorizing: Implications for Theory, Research, and Pedagogy. Communication Theory, 31(2), 228–249. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtab002

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104(March), 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45

Xiaowen, T., & Dervin, F. (2024). Power relations and change in intercultural communication education: Zhongyong as a complementary analytical framework. Language and Intercultural Communication, 24(2), 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2023.2256310

Zhang, L., Basham, J. D., & Yang, S. (2020). Understanding the implementation of personalized learning: A research synthesis. Educational Research Review, 31, 100339. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EDUREV.2020.100339

Downloads

Published

2025-12-24

How to Cite

., F., Yuwita, N., Riswandari, N., & Aji, T. S. (2025). Communication Strategy Education with a Cultural Perspective through a Co-Culture Communication Approach. Journal of Innovation and Technology, 2025(2). https://doi.org/10.61453/joit.v2025no29