Information Usefulness and Workplace Cohesion: A Conceptual Framework

Authors

  • Marie M. Tatfeng Niger Delta University, Wilberforce Island, Bayelsa State, Nigeria
  • Margaret Ekeins Niger Delta University, Wilberforce Island, Bayelsa State, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61453/INTIj.202505

Keywords:

Information usefulness, workplace cohesion, organizational learning

Abstract

This study researched the relationship between information usefulness and workplace cohesion in organizations. Information uniqueness when it is not properly established in the workplace especially when data is not distinct and not easily duplicated. Research objectives focused on ascertaining the role of dimensions such as information distinctiveness, rarity, and suitability in advancing outcomes of 3 workplace cohesion such as assignment cohesion, social cohesion, and collaboration. In information usefulness in workplace cohesion rarity when organizations are not likely to be rare, it can cause negative experiences such as conflicts, political infighting, and uncooperative team members. Organizational culture not properly influenced might lead to insignificant decision-making.  This research also examined the control of organizational culture on the correlation among the variables. The paper discussed the role of information usefulness – specifying its meaning and implications for institutions. Focus was also placed on the individual aspect of workplace cohesion. It was thereafter concluded that information usefulness – based on related features such as information uniqueness, rarity, and appropriateness, drives the extent of workplace cohesion and contributes substantially to outcomes of task cohesion, social cohesion, and collaboration. This correlation is moreover inclined and inured by the scenery or outline of customs modified and applied by the organization. It was also recommended that considerations of applicability and context be emphasized in the setting of information and its use in the organization.

References

Adnan, M., Abdulhamid, T., & Solail, B. (2018). Predicting firm performance through resource-based framework. European Journal of Business and Management, 10(1), 1-12. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/234628214.pdf

Allen, T., & Morton, M. (2004). Information technology and the corporation of the 1990s. Oxford University Press.

Andrews, M. C., Kacmar, K. M., Blakely, G. L., & Bucklew, N. S. (2008). Group cohesion as an enhancement to the justice-affective commitment relationship. Group & Organization Management, 33(6), 736-755. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601108326797

Antonacopoulou, E., & Chiva, R. (2007). The social complexity of organizational learning: The dynamics of learning and organizing. Management Learning, 38(3), 277-295. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507607079029

Argote, L. (2011). Organizational learning research: Past, present and future. Management Learning, 42(4), 439-446. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507611408217

Banki, S. (2010). Is a good deed constructive regardless of intent? Organizational citizenship behavior, motive, and group outcomes. Small Group Research, 41(3), 354-375. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1177/1046496410364065

Barney, J. (2001). Is the resource-based view a useful perspective for strategic management research? Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 41-56. https://www.jstor.org/stable/259393

Beal, D. J., Cohen, R. R., Burke, M. J., & McLendon, C. L. (2003). Cohesion and performance in groups: A meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(6), 989-1004. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.989

Carless, S. A. (2000). Reply to Carron and Brawley. Small Group Research, 31(1), 107-118. https://doi.org/10.1177/104649640003100106

Carless, S. A., & De Paola, C. (2000). The measurement of cohesion in work teams. Small Group Research, 31(1), 71-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/104649640003100104

Carron, A. V., & Brawley, L. R. (2000). Cohesion: Conceptual and measurement issues. Small Group Research, 31(1), 89-106. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1177/104649640003100105

Casey-Campbell, M., & Martens, M. L. (2009). Sticking it all together: A critical assessment of the group cohesion performance literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(2), 223-246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2008.00239.x

Chen, C.-H. V., & Tang, Y.-Y. (2009). Interdependence and organizational citizenship behavior: Exploring the mediating effect of group cohesion in multilevel analysis. The Journal of Psychology, 143(6), 625-640. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980903218273

Chiva, R., Alegre, J., & Lapiedra, R. (2007). Measuring organizational learning capability among the workforce. International Journal of Manpower, 28(3/4), 224-242. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437720710755227

Dennis, E. (2007). Information systems for sustainable competitive advantage. Information and Technology Press.

Dewan, S., & Kraemer, K. L. (2000). Information technology and productivity: Evidence from country-level data. Management Science, 46(4), 548-562. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/2774904.2774912

Evans, P., & Wurster, T. (2007). Strategy and the new economics of information. Harvard Business Review, 75(5), 70-82. https://hbr.org/1997/09/strategy-and-the-new-economics-of-information

Eys, M. A., Loughead, T., Bray, S. R., & Carron, A. V. (2009). Development of a cohesion questionnaire for youth: The Youth Sport Environment Questionnaire. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 31(3), 390-408. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.31.3.390

Foss, N. (1998). Resource-based perspective: An assessment and diagnosis of problems. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 14(3), 133-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0956-5221(97)00030-4

Friedkin, N. E. (2004). Social cohesion. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 409-425. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110625

Gherardi, S., & Nicolini, D. (2002). Learning in a constellation of interconnected practices. Journal of Management Studies, 39(4), 419-436. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.t01-1-00298

Gregory, B., Harris, S., Armenakis, A., & Shook, C. (2009). Organizational culture and effectiveness: A study of values, attitudes, and organizational outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 62(7), 673-679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.05.021

Hacker, D., & Saxton, G. D. (2007). The strategic use of information technology by the nonprofit organization: Increasing capacity and untapped potential. Public Administration Review, 67(3), 474-487. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1742466

Hobday, M. (2000). The project-based organization: An ideal form for managing complex products and systems. Research Policy, 29(7-8), 871-893. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00110-4

Kevin, J. (2006). Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: A resource-based analysis. MIS Quarterly, 30(3), 487-505. https://jaybarney.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/7-Information-Technology-_-Sustained-Competitive-Advantage-Resource-Based-Analysis-MataFuerstBarney-MIS-Quarterly-1996.pdf

Merrell, P. (2012). Effective change management: The simple truth. Management Services, 56(2), 20-23. https://www.proquest.com/trade-journals/effective-change-management-simple-truth/docview/1027234230/se-2

Patriotta, G. (2003). Organizational knowledge in the making: How firms create, use, and institutionalize knowledge. Oxford University Press.

Reber, A. S., & Reber, E. (2001). The Penguin dictionary of psychology (3rd ed.). Penguin Books.

Takahashi, A. R. W. (2007). Descortinando os processos da aprendizagem organizacional no desenvolvimento de competências em instituições de ensino (Doctoral dissertation). Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-20

How to Cite

Tatfeng, M. M., & Ekeins, M. (2025). Information Usefulness and Workplace Cohesion: A Conceptual Framework. INTI Journal, 2025(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.61453/INTIj.202505

Issue

Section

Articles