Towards Resilient Construction Contracts: Defining Adaptive Clause Characteristics for Disaster Risk in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61453/INTIj.20260109Keywords:
Construction, Contract clauses, Disaster-responsive, IndonesiaAbstract
Indonesia is one of the most disaster-prone countries in the world, facing frequent earthquakes, floods, volcanic eruptions, and other natural hazards that significantly disrupt infrastructure development. However, most construction contracts used in Indonesia remain rigid and ill-equipped to accommodate such risks. This study aims to identify the key characteristics required for disaster-responsive contract clauses that are contextually grounded, legally sound, and operationally feasible. Using a qualitative desktop study approach, this research analyzes standard contract models commonly used in Indonesia, namely based on Presidential Regulation No. 16/2018, MPWH templates, and FIDIC, and compares them against the country’s disaster risk landscape. The findings reveal gaps in disaster-specific risk allocation, post-disaster recovery procedures, and integration of local hazard data. To address these challenges, the paper proposes a set of adaptive contract characteristics, including context-based risk mapping, actionable emergency protocols, legally grounded thresholds for clause activation, and flexible mechanisms for suspension, renegotiation, and compensation. These characteristics can serve as a foundation for revising standard contract documents and improving legal resilience in infrastructure contracting, which would ultimately enhance project continuity and reduce disputes.
References
Anthopoulos, L. G., Kostavara, E., & Pantouvakis, J.-P. (2013). An effective disaster recovery model for construction projects. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 74, 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.03.026
Asifah, Y., Putri, A. S., Albab, N. I. U., & Apriliyanti, A. (2023). Strategi pengembangan infrastruktur daerah rawan bencana Kota Baubau. Plano Madani: Jurnal Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, 12(2), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.24252/jpm.v12i2.42493
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Hadi, S. (2020). Disaster management in the implementation of the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals in Indonesia. The Journal of Indonesia Sustainable Development Planning, 1(1), 105–111. https://doi.org/10.46456/jisdep.v1i1.49
Kalak, M., Zenter, Ö., & Özmen, E. F. (2024). Flexible model proposals for post-disaster temporary housing in architectural design. Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture and Planning, 5(3), 496–509. https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2024.v5i3145
Mohammadi, S., Aibinu, A. A., & Oraee, M. (2024). Risk allocation and mitigation practices for building information modeling: Addressing legal and contractual risks associated with contract documentation. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-1039
Puri, A., Ameer Ali, N., & Elkharboutly, M. (2025). Contracting challenges in post-disaster reconstruction in developing countries: Evidence from Nepal reconstruction. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 121, Article 105428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105428
Riefky, T., Moeis, F. R., Sofiyandi, Y., Adriansyah, M., Izzuddin, A., Farhani, A., & Jasmine, S. (2021). Resilient infrastructure in Indonesia: A way forward (LPEM-FEBUI Working Paper No. 064). LPEM-FEBUI.
Walls, C. (2024). The legal impact of force majeure on construction contracts. Creative Education, 15(12), 2597–2608. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2024.1512158
Widyangga, P. A. P., Mardianto, M. F. F., Pratiwi, F. A., Putrie, A. V. G., Andriani, P. E., Amelia, D., & Dewi, D. A. (2024). Natural disaster mapping on Java Island using biplot analysis. Jurnal Varian, 7(2), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.30812/varian.v7i2.2634
Zhang, L., & Xi, G. (2023). How does contractual flexibility affect a contractor’s opportunistic behavior? Roles of justice perception and communication quality. Buildings, 13(3), Article 615. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13030615
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 INTI Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.